- Gov. Dan Malloy took unnecessary heat for saying if a policy is not racist in intent, it is racist in impact.
Sachets are taken three times per day
While Republicans attacked Malloy’s rhetoric as applied to drug free school zones, Malloy’s analysis paralleled Sheff v. O’Neill’s driving idea of de jure v. de facto segregation.
just after a main meal. Water is not required. It's just a case of opening up a sachet
Malloy’s “racist in impact” framing must be applied to as many unfair realities in Connecticut cities that we can attach it to, from education policy to housing policy.
This week, I want to focus on how flat property values in cities are a reflection of this “if not racist in intent, racist in impact” framework.
letting rip and pouring it into the mouth. Although XLS Medical Fat Binder Direct Powder Sticks provide a no-fuss means of getting the active ingredients into the body
Let’s start with the basic numbers. Connecticut has 3.6 million people. About 2.52 million people are white, according to rough U.S. Census Bureau counts. That leaves about 400,000, or 11 percent, black residents and about 525,000 (15 percent) Latino citizens.
Omega Pharma points out the importance of ensuring an adequate amount of water is consumed throughout the day. carisoprodol drug cheap Severe depression Loss of a significant relationship.
Less than one million people – not even a third – live in Connecticut’s major cities. New Haven, Hartford, New Britain, Waterbury, Danbury, and Bridgeport have 800,000 residents combined.
Maintaining a sense of humor. It has been said that if you push a tragedy far enough
And those who do live in the cities live in a different place than suburban white Connecticut Hartford has 30 percent whites, 39 percent blacks and 43 percent Latino.
it becomes a comedy. The everyday tragedies that we experience in our lives can be burdensome
The small size of Connecticut’s cities, combined with the racial imbalance, means our cities limited power. By the numbers, the white population runs the state, and this skews the experience for the non-white population.
Statewide, the Census says only 10 percent of the state lives below the poverty level, and 68 percent of the people own homes in Connecticut.
Again, Hartford does not reflect these numbers. Hartford has a 34 percent poverty rate with 25 percent home ownership rate.
but through comedy
Clearly, forces larger than the cities themselves control their destiny. The Connecticut legislature is weighted towards the suburbs. We have never had a non-white Speaker of the House, and I can’t see when we will get one.
we get a sense of relief and perspective. While life’s absurdities can be frustrating and distressing
In some people’s worldview, if there is racism, it does not impact policy making. This appears to the philosophy of Rep. Themis Klarides of Derby, the head of the Republican caucus in the Connecticut General Assembly’s House of Representatives.
finding humor in them (oftentimes by imagining them pushed to extremes) can prompt a more pragmatic—and sometimes realistic—view of things. Being able to laugh at a situation is a valuable asset; being able to laugh at oneself is even more important. Thus
She threw a giant baby fit after Malloy’s racist in impact statement. But Rep. Klarides lives in a special Republican bubble. The Census bureau considers her Derby a city, albeit one with 13,000 inhabitants, 75 percent of whom are white, 7 percent black and 14 percent Latino.
a sense of humor can ameliorate our feelings of hopelessness about existential issues. "When I feel as a host of a show that I can't use words that are flowery
Derby enjoys a 56 percent home ownership rate and a 13 percent poverty level. Clearly, her version of “city” is more along the lines of the rest of white Connecticut.
With such high home ownership rates, it is a safe bet that Derby has seen its houses prices continue to appreciate during the past 40 years.
that are exultatory
In Hartford, most residential properties have not seen their home values rise in decades. A woman in Baltimore lamented recently how the house she bought in 1977 is worth only $500.00 more than she paid for it.
Her analysis of the financial trends leading her to be in a losing proposition as a property owner in a city struck a chord.
I feel like I've been disenfranchised," Oz continued
And I said, hey, wait a second: my condo that I purchased in 2002 here in Hartford on Laurel Street is in the same boat. I paid $25,500.00 for it, and it may be worth less than what I bought it for.
"like my power has been taken away to get people. You don't want to be on a pulpit talking about how passionate you are about life and thinking
If I take a comparable – my third floor neighbor in the same building on Laurel Street, she bought for $30,000.00 in 2011 and sold for $25,000 last year.
well you know
Extrapolate this across the city of Hartford, and we have a major problem, caused by forces much larger than this city’s administration, with no one proposing solutions.
if I use that word it's going to be quoted back to me. And yes
The financial system in America ties much of your personal financial worth in your home. When you pay down your mortgage, you build equity, and hopefully, your investment in your house pays dividends in the form of property appreciation.
Yet in the cities, this flatlining of property values dooms us.
the hundred words around it are all about doing other things right. So
The condo unit I am a part of on Laurel Street is an 1890 Victorian on the National Register of Historic Places. Inside, it is gorgeous – an amazing rounded wood staircase, 10-foot ceilings, original stained glass and woodwork, including oak moldings, pine floors, oak fireplaces and pocket doors.
Yet if the house burned down, it would cost far more to rebuild the edifice than it is worth.
How is this possible? Governmental policy.
I'm very respectful
“The role of federal and state government in creating and maintaining residential racial segregation must be understood, without excuse, as a reality of American history,” wrote Marc Seitles in his comment “The Perpetuation of Residential Racial Segregation in America: Historical Discrimination, Modern Forms of Exclusion and Inclusionary Remedies”, published in The Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law in 1996.
I've heard the message
While Seitles’ comment delves deeply into these issues, from redlining to steering to discrimination to segregation, I want to focus on flat property values as a function and a racist in impact result.
I've told my colleagues at the FTC
In places like Avon, Litchfield, Guilford and Trumbull, people who can afford to buy into the home market expect their investment to build more than just equity. They expect their home to grow in value.
I get it." order xanax without a prescription cheap Severe depression
For example, in 1971, my parents purchased a house in Watertown for like $35,000.00. Today, that house is worth more than $250,000.00. Their nest egg quite literally is their nest. When they put in a new dishwasher or bathroom, they know they will get their money back.
Here in Hartford, I have lost money as a homeowner. All of the maintenance dollars poured into my condo unit on Laurel Street, from installing a new bathroom (with a dual-flush toilet to reduce water use) to installing new windows and refinishing the floors and fresh coats of paint on the wall has had no impact on my unit’s value.
This is to say nothing of the tens of thousands the Condominium Association has done in exterior/common area work – a new roof, rebuilt chimney, repaired sewer pipe and so on.
Limited financial incentive entices an investor (or homeowner) to purchase a property when the land itself does not improve in value. This explains the unique colonialism of landlords in Hartford.
Out of town investors come in, buy up dilapidated property, put the minimum in, and extract what profit they can from the building. This leaves the housing stock in worse condition.
This problem of attract investment into a dead economic zone vexes politicians and they fail to articulate the issue. The North End Promise Zone does not come close to fixing the problem.
Wags have long expressed that no investment can happen in Hartford without major public subsidies. This depreciation of property values in part explains this (although there are many other reasons).
Subsidies are one policy that can address this issue of racist in impact housing laws. Unfortunately, as subsidies are used today in Hartford, they have overwhelmingly tended to favor the winners society has already chosen – the Josh Solomons and the Downtown Dwellers who already have money.
While Section 8 is a subsidy for people, administration, with tactics like steering, can manipulate who it benefits. Where do beleaguered homeowners in Hartford find help?
Unfortunately, since well more than 70 percent of the people in Connecticut do not experience this lack of home value appreciation, they will not to address it in the legislature or through elections. Nor do we have a mayor or other elected representatives who seem interested in this issue.
Five or six policy choices can help change this. Seitles detailed mandatory set asides, affordable housing appeals, statewide inclusionary housing objectives through planning statutes, inclusionary zoning programs, and mobility programs.
To that we should add property tax reform, regionalism and the abolition of town lines. A just society requires that we confront the “if not racist in intent, racist in impact” governance oppressing our cities.
Edited for clarity and removal of errors 2015-06-07