March 10, 2010
By Ken Krayeske • 8:00 PM EST

Tom Foley gives a press conference at the Connecticut state capital, December 3, 2009, after he switched running for from U.S. Senator to Connecticut Governor. Photo by Christine Stuart, courtesy of CTNewsJunkie.
Ed’s Note: This is the fourth part of a four-part interview with Tom Foley, Republican candidate for Governor of Connecticut.
Part I, published the week of February 10, 2010, featured some of Foley’s ideas about voter participation, being an ambassador to Ireland, and UConn’s tuition increase.
Part II, published the week of February 17, 2010, scratched the surface of his participation as the Director of Private Sector Development for the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq from August 2003 through March 2004.
Part III, published the week of March 3, 2010, searched Foley’s responses to those who criticized the job he did in Iraq.
Tom Foley has measuring sticks for what success in Iraq will look like.
"If Iraq emerges as a representative government with representation of human rights, I think the goals that our government had in mind when they invaded Iraq will be achieved," he said. "People will have to decide if it was worth the cost in terms of lives and money."
This leads to the inevitable question: Seven years ago, in March 2003, did you support the invasion of Iraq?
"I wasn't a member of the government, I wasn’t in the legislature," he said. "I supported my government's foreign policy. If you are not a member of the legislature, or a member of the executive branch, you don't vote on every aspect of our government's foreign policy. I supported our government's policy."
But Mr. Foley, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis said that the office of citizen is the highest office in a democracy. As a citizen, in March 2003, did you support the invasion of Iraq?
"I supported my government's foreign policy," he said.
The Bush Administration's foreign policy in March 2003 was the invasion of Iraq. Did you support the invasion of Iraq in March 2003?
"I supported my government's foreign policy," he said.
About a week after we had that merry-go-round of a conversation, it still bugged me. So I emailed Foley, and asked him to call me back for a few follow-ups. When he did, I asked him why the distaste for saying that you supported the invasion of Iraq?
"There is no distaste," Foley said. "I was just making the point that when you are a private citizen being asked if you supported it, I trust the government and support its foreign policy, but I wasn't a policy maker. To say I supported it, that is a different question if you are a policy maker."
Then Foley slipped back into his talking point about how history will be the ultimate judge of the invasion of Iraq. Doesn’t it bother you, then, I asked Foley, that we have spent thousands of American lives, more than a million Iraqi lives, and maybe $300 billion and we don't know the outcome?












